Comments on: The future of the future teller

By: bob

bob — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:39:49 +0000

if you had to design something that could acheive perfect randomness, what would it be?

By: Surya

Surya — Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:24:59 +0000

Miaris, thanks!

By: miaris

miaris — Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:04:58 +0000

I do agree completely with your article

By: sajan Kavinda

sajan Kavinda — Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:28:55 +0000

life

By: Surya

Surya — Wed, 06 Jul 2005 05:33:17 +0000

Que Sera Sera…

By: billy finch

billy finch — Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:00:09 +0000

what will i be when i grow up

By: Srijith

Srijith — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

You asked “how random is this random number generator? Isnt it mathematically impossible to achieve perfect randomness”

Maybe the eggs “work” precisely because the RNG are not purely random. Pure randomness would meant that *nothing* can influence the outcome.

By: Surya

Surya — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Hmm..hard to believe..does that mean that the less random the RNG is, then the more it can be influenced by external sources and thus possibly more accurate?

By: Prav G

Prav G — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

WOW! Thats an amazing piece of info & whats “RNG” ? r u guys talking about the “REG”?

I got reminded of the movie “Pi”

hmmm…amazing…

By: Surya

Surya — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

RNG is short for random number generator.

Havent got a chance to watch Pi yet, but have heard its pretty cool.